|
| Login | Sign up | Settings | My Wish List |
![]() | Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context by Daniel A. Bell ISBN-10: 9780691123080 ISBN-10: 0-691-12308-X ISBN-13: 9780691123080 ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12308-0 Paperback 2006-07-24 Princeton University Press Find Lowest Price | |
Editorials | ||
Product Description Is liberal democracy appropriate for East Asia? In this provocative book, Daniel Bell argues for morally legitimate alternatives to Western-style liberal democracy in the region. Beyond Liberal Democracy, which continues the author's influential earlier work, is divided into three parts that correspond to the three main hallmarks of liberal democracy--human rights, democracy, and capitalism. These features have been modified substantially during their transmission to East Asian societies that have been shaped by nonliberal practices and values. Bell points to the dangers of implementing Western-style models and proposes alternative justifications and practices that may be more appropriate for East Asian societies. If human rights, democracy, and capitalism are to take root and produce beneficial outcomes in East Asia, Bell argues, they must be adjusted to contemporary East Asian political and economic realities and to the values of nonliberal East Asian political traditions such as Confucianism and Legalism. Local knowledge is therefore essential for realistic and morally informed contributions to debates on political reform in the region, as well as for mutual learning and enrichment of political theories. Beyond Liberal Democracy is indispensable reading for students and scholars of political theory, Asian studies, and human rights, as well as anyone concerned about China's political and economic future and how Western governments and organizations should engage with China. | ||
Reviews | ||
The conclusion of this book is impressive The conclusion of this book is impressive, yet the way it approaches its conclustion is much less inspiring. I agree with all the positive reviews above, but I want to add some "negative ones." 1. there is a serious problem of excluding "rule of law" as one of the main pillars of democracy; 2. there is no central theory by the author or by which the author clearly employs to argue what he attempts to argue; 3. there is too much focus on the conventional "book culture" to approach Asian values; 4. the claim as a pluralist rather than a relativist calls for more normative philosophical discussions; 5. "Cultural revolution is a good idea badly implemented" is a mistaken statement; 6. there is obviously a lack of reality-check on the practice of the western democracy so as to better support the author's argument; | ||