|
| Login | Sign up | Settings | My Wish List |
![]() | Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities by Stanley Fish ISBN-10: 9780674467262 ISBN-10: 0-674-46726-4 ISBN-13: 9780674467262 ISBN-13: 978-0-674-46726-2 Paperback 1982-06-25 Harvard University Press Find Lowest Price | |
Editorials | ||
Product Description Stanley Fish is one of America's most stimulating literary theorists. In this book, he undertakes a profound reexamination of some of criticism's most basic assumptions. He penetrates to the core of the modern debate about interpretation, explodes numerous misleading formulations, and offers a stunning proposal for a new way of thinking about the way we read. Fish begins by examining the relation between a reader and a text, arguing against the formalist belief that the text alone is the basic, knowable, neutral, and unchanging component of literary experience. But in arguing for the right of the reader to interpret and in effect create the literary work, he skillfully avoids the old trap of subjectivity. To claim that each reader essentially participates in the making of a poem or novel is not, he shows, an invitation to unchecked subjectivity and to the endless proliferation of competing interpretations. For each reader approaches a literary work not as an isolated individual but as part of a community of readers. 'Indeed," he writes, "it is interpretive communities, rather than either the text or reader, that produce meanings." The book is developmental, not static. Fish at all times reveals the evolutionary aspect of his work--the manner in which he has assumed new positions, altered them, and then moved on. Previously published essays are introduced by headnotes which relate them to the central notion of interpretive communities as it emerges in the final chapters. In the course of refining his theory, Fish includes rather than excludes the thinking of other critics and shows how often they agree with him, even when he and they may appear to be most dramatically at odds. Engaging, lucid, provocative, this book will immediately find its place among the seminal works of modern literary criticism. | ||
Reviews | ||
Interpretation is the only game in town SF is a pragmatist and basically follows John Searle, J.L. Austin, and P.F. Strawson regarding philosophy of language. One aspect of this is to move away from an interpretive stance to the view that there is a clear effect of the reading of a passage on fluent speakers of the language and secondarily an interpretive effect dependent on each speakers (readers) point of view. (There is a nice Paul Ricoeur quote.) SF critiques relativism using it in the sense that is untenable. What makes an interpretation acceptable? "Interpretation is the only game in town." "There are no moves that are not moves in the game, and this includes even the move by which one claims no longer to be a player." | ||
Fish is not your average philosopher I got this book from the footnotes of Nancey Murphy's "Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism" and various Stanley Hauerwas books. To the point, I had only read snippets of his writing. After seeing his work, I know that I still have a lot more learning to do. Looking forward to reading more of his stuff. | ||
Standing Before Sterling, Young Stanley Conceives His Calling Rhetoric effaces who we Were, and from these spires and courts, Purges traces of our Jewy Uncles in Bermuda shorts. | ||
two stars for evocative writing The notion of "interpretive communities" is at best derivative of Kuhn's classical work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and at worst a framework of obstruction employed against those who wish to revivify literary theory and criticism in the wake of postmodern hegemony. | ||
Great Book I am amazed to discover that I'm the very first person to review this book for Amazon.com! This is quite a famous text, which readers often find polarizing, and that all the more makes my being the first to review Is There a Text in This Class amazing. Stanley Fish is one of the best literary theorists in America. Actually, along with fellow Duke professor Fredric Jameson, he is the best America has produced (but you MUST include Jameson). So it's a tie. On a more personal note (I'm gay), Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler are pretty incredible too. Sedgwick's reading of Billy Budd is out of this world, and I highly recommend her Epistomology of the Closet. Okay, on to Fish. Fish is one of the major theorists of the Reader-Response school. I won't go into that here, however. But I suggest you read up on Wolfgang Iser, David Bleich, Michael Riffaterre, Hans Robert Jauss, Gerlad Prince, etc. On to the text itself. Okay, you don't exactly have to have read Milton to understand some of Fish's essays, but it would really, really help. "Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics", in Part One and all of the essays in Part Two will no doubt be the most accessable to writers not familiar with Fish's work. Also, the introduction in Part One is very important, and sheds light on the theoretical development of his thought. This is true too of the shorter introduction in Part Two. Each essay in Parts One and Two are introduced with Fish's interesting commentary (but these should not be treated as a substitute for reading the essays themselves!). That is all I'll say here. But I'd like to leave you with one of my favorite quotes from the book (p. 51): "In general I am drawn to works which do not allow a reader the security of his normal patterns of thought and belief." This is a great guiding rule for selecting novels to analyze. Fish said this in response to Wayne Booth's opinion that you can't possibly understand or enjoy Paradise Lost if you are not a Protestant of the same denomination as Milton. While this may be true to some extent, it should not dissuade anyone from tackling any work of literature. | ||